coplug
    Back to PCN explorer

    PCN reports / Core20PLUS5

    Dorking PCN

    Health Inequalities Profile

    A Core20PLUS5 health inequalities profile of Dorking PCN, built from published national data. The full report is below; practice-level detail and analysis open in Coplug, an AI-native spatial reasoning platform.

    PCN code
    U77584
    Local authority
    Mole Valley
    Report
    15 sections

    Mole Valley · NHS Surrey Heartlands Integrated Care Board; NHS Surrey and Sussex Integrated Care Board · 4 GP practices

    PCN location

    01 / 15

    Board summary

    Health Inequalities Profile

    Mole Valley · NHS Surrey Heartlands Integrated Care Board; NHS Surrey and Sussex Integrated Care Board · 4 GP practices

    Key figures

    44,841

    Registered population

    57.9% aged 18–64

    24.9%

    Aged 65+

    ICB 18.8% · England 17.9%

    6.8%

    Ethnic minority (non-White)

    2.8% Asian · England 9.6%

    0.0%

    In IMD quintile 1

    ICB 0.8% · England 21.0%

    0

    Core20 residents (est.)

    Resident basis; registered basis 0 · see page 3

    7,706

    Hypertension register

    +2.08% in 3 yrs · England +5.60%

    434

    SMI register

    47.7% of Mole Valley's

    781

    COPD register

    Reviews +10.67% in 3 yrs

    Forecast to 2030

    8,396

    Hypertension patients, 2030

    +690 on today

    81.5%

    QRISK ≥20% on statins, 2030

    +8.05pp over 3 yrs

    6.2%

    Cancer prevalence, 2030

    England 4.5%

    Three things the board should see

    73.7%
    Hypertension blood pressure control exceeds England and ICB.

    73.7% of hypertension patients are treated to target against 73.8% in Mole Valley, 71.4% in the ICB, and 70.3% in England.

    76.6%
    SMI annual BMI recording trails local and national.

    SMI BMI recording is 76.6% (England 82.1%), falling 1.9 pp over three years (England +5.1 pp), which may reflect recall gaps to audit.

    0.4%
    Learning disability prevalence below Mole Valley and England.

    Recorded prevalence is 0.4% (174 patients) versus Mole Valley 0.5% and England 0.6% (+50 to +90 modelled gap), which may reflect coding differences.

    Sources & context

    PCN and practice-level primary care data; ICB and provider context on page 8

    Powered by Coplug · Page 1 of 15
    02 / 15

    Population, age and ethnicity

    With 24.9% aged 65+, an older demographic may elevate PCN frailty needs

    Dorking PCN cares for 44,841 registered patients across four practices. The population is older than benchmarks: 24.9% are aged 65+ (11,154 patients), compared with 23.4% in Mole Valley, 18.8% in NHS Surrey Heartlands ICB, and 17.9% in England. Children aged 0–17 comprise 17.2% (7,705 patients), below Mole Valley (18.3%), the ICB (20.4%), and England (19.6%). Census data show 93.2% of local residents identify as White (Mole Valley 92.7%, ICB 85.3%, England 81.1%), with a 6.8% ethnic minority share, though Census resident figures do not match registered-patient lists directly.

    Age profile

    0–1717.2%
    18–6457.9%
    65+24.9%

    65+: ICB 18.8%, England 17.9%

    Ethnicity

    White93.2%
    Asian2.8%
    Mixed2.3%
    Black0.9%
    Other0.7%

    Older people · falls rows are Mole Valley local-authority (LA) data, not PCN

    MeasureLocalSouth EastEnglandPeriod
    Falls admissions, 65+, per 100,000 (Mole Valley LA)1,8452,0181,9582024/25
    Diabetes with frailty: HbA1c ≤75 mmol/mol (PCN)87.6%82.2%81.9%2024/25
    Diabetes without frailty: HbA1c ≤58 mmol/mol (PCN)64.6%57.8%57.4%2024/25
    Falls admissions, 65 to 79, per 100,000 (Mole Valley LA)8699819552024/25
    Falls deaths, all ages, per 100,000 (Mole Valley LA)9.814.014.82022‑24
    Sources & context

    Census 2021; Fingertips falls and diabetes. Falls are local-authority data. Ethnic minority = 100% minus White

    Powered by Coplug · Page 2 of 15
    03 / 15

    Deprivation and Core20

    Average IMD decile is 7.6 with 0.0% of registered patients in Core20 areas

    The PCN average IMD decile is 7.6, less deprived than England (5.5) but below Mole Valley (8.2) and NHS Surrey Heartlands Integrated Care Board (7.9). Practice deciles range from 6.7 at Leith Hill Practice to 7.8 at Dorking Medical Practice (Brockwood Medical Practice 7.6, Medwyn Surgery 7.7). Core20 share is 0.0% across all practices (England 21.0%, ICB 0.8%, Mole Valley 0.0%), with an estimated 0 patients. With zero patients in Core20 deciles, health inequality work may need to target inclusion cohorts and clinical risk rather than area deprivation.

    % of patients in IMD quintile 1, by practice

    Dashed line: England 21.0% · right column: Core20 patients, registered basis

    Dorking Medical0.0% · 0 patients
    Brockwood Medical0.0% · 0 patients
    Medwyn0.0% · 0 patients
    Leith Hill0.0% · 0 patients
    Sources & context

    Deprivation: Index of Multiple Deprivation, applied to registered patients

    Powered by Coplug · Page 3 of 15
    04 / 15

    PLUS groups and inclusion health

    PLUS groups and inclusion health

    434

    SMI register

    0.96% recorded prevalence

    174

    Learning disability register

    0.38% recorded prevalence

    26

    Care homes, 977 beds

    In the PCN catchment

    8.3%

    Provide unpaid care

    Mole Valley, Census 2021

    The PCN records 174 learning disability patients (0.4% prevalence vs Mole Valley 0.5%, ICB 0.5%, England 0.6%) and 434 severe mental illness patients (1.0%). The catchment contains 26 care homes with 977 beds, though resident registration is unconfirmed. Recorded learning disability prevalence sits below England, so register validation could help confirm complete health check reach.

    Severe mental illness: physical health checks

    For 434 severe mental illness patients, annual BMI checks (76.6%) trail England (82.1%), falling 1.9 pp over three years (England +5.1 pp). BP checks (80.8%) also lag England (83.4%), indicating overdue physical health checks to audit.

    Sources & context

    QOF registers; Census 2021 carers; care homes and homelessness as supplied. Carers and homelessness are local-authority data

    Powered by Coplug · Page 4 of 15
    05 / 15

    Clinical focus: hypertension and lipids

    Clinical focus: hypertension and lipids

    7,706

    Hypertension register

    +2.08%

    Register growth, 3 yrs

    Mole Valley +3.55% · England +5.60%

    +6.22pp

    BP control, under 80

    ≤140/90 · +3.82pp aged 80+

    +690

    More patients by 2030

    Forecast 8,396 (17.70%)

    Hypertension case-finding and control

    Recorded hypertension prevalence is 17.0% (7,706 patients), above Mole Valley (16.3%), the ICB (14.3%) and England (15.2%), ranging from 14.0% at Medwyn Surgery to 19.6% at Brockwood Medical Practice. Three-year register growth of +2.1% trailed England (+5.6%) and the ICB (+5.3%). However, clinical control is strong: 73.7% are treated to target (England 70.3%), with recent checks at 90.5% (England 90.0%). Control reaches 72.0% for patients aged under 80 (England 67.8%) and 82.5% for those aged 80+ (England 81.2%). Crude prevalence is not age-adjusted. While treatment control exceeds national benchmarks, slower register expansion could reflect case-finding variation, testable by clinical audit of screening protocols.

    Lipids and statins

    Lipid-lowering therapy uptake trails England across high-risk cohorts: 61.6% for QRISK ≥ 20% (England 63.6%), 66.4% in CKD (England 70.3%), and 81.9% for diabetes with secondary CVD (England 84.4%). Lower uptake than national benchmarks across high-risk cohorts suggests an opportunity to audit lipid therapy recall protocols.

    MeasureItemsCost / itemICBEnglandAnnual spend
    Lipid-modifying, 202688,891£2.00£2.24£1.86£177,782
    Cardiovascular (all), 2025113,352£3.74£4.74£3.33£423,936

    For lipid-modifying drugs, the PCN prescribed 73,762 items in 2025, spending £149,737 at £2.03 per item. Unit cost is above England (£1.82) but below Mole Valley (£2.15) and NHS Surrey Heartlands Integrated Care Board (£2.18). The PCN spent £15,490 more than at England's unit cost, and £11,064 less than at the ICB's unit cost.

    Sources & context

    QOF hypertension register and BP control indicators; prescribing items and cost as supplied

    Powered by Coplug · Page 5 of 15
    06 / 15

    Clinical focus: respiratory, cancer register and children

    Clinical focus: respiratory, cancer register and children

    Respiratory

    +3.83%

    Asthma reviews, PCN 3-yr change

    +4.44%

    Asthma reviews, England

    +0.32%

    Asthma prevalence, PCN

    Across 3,066 registered asthma patients (prevalence 7.1% vs England 6.6%), 66.8% had an annual review (England 65.7%), leaving about 1,000 without a recorded review (calculated 1,017). Asthma prescribing for ages 5–19 is 956 per 1,000 (England 1,488). Meanwhile, COPD prevalence is 1.7% (781 patients; England 1.9%), but annual reviews at 74.7% lag England (76.4%) and the ICB (77.7%), despite +10.7% three-year growth (England +2.8%). This pattern could indicate recall gaps across both respiratory registers.

    Cancer register and children's immunisation

    Cancer prevalence is 4.8% (2,169 patients; England 3.8%). In childhood immunisations, 12-month 6-in-1 reaches 95.6%, but 24-month coverage dips to 90.2% (ICB 94.3%) and MMR1 to 86.6% (ICB 91.4%), both below the 95.0% target. By age 5, MMR1 achieves 98.0% while MMR2 is 92.9%, leaving a 5.1 pp dose gap to recover through active recall.

    Dashed line: 95% national coverage target · solid tick: England

    6-in-1 at 12 months95.6%

    England 91.0%

    6-in-1 complete primary course at 24 months90.2%

    England 92.2%

    MMR dose 1 at 24 months86.6%

    England 88.3%

    MMR dose 2 at age 592.9%

    England 82.8%

    4-in-1 pre-school booster at age 590.8%

    England 80.9%

    Sources & context

    QOF registers and review indicators; childhood immunisation coverage as supplied

    Powered by Coplug · Page 6 of 15
    07 / 15

    Early cancer diagnosis

    Early cancer diagnosis

    61.4%

    Surrey Heartlands ICB, stage 1–2

    55.3%

    England, 2022

    75%

    National ambition by 2028

    ~650

    Extra early-stage cases a year to reach the ambition

    Stage 1–2 share by cancer type, 2022Surrey Heartlands ICBEnglandNo usable stageStaged cancers
    Prostate65.7%53.2%18%1,044
    Breast88.2%85.4%27%798
    Bowel48.1%47.0%18%626
    Lung33.2%33.8%17%497
    Skin cancer89.8%87.8%19%384

    Across NHS Surrey Heartlands ICB in 2022, 61.4% of staged cancers (2,955 of 4,810) were diagnosed at stage 1 or 2, exceeding England (55.3%) but 13.6 pp below the 75.0% national ambition for 2028. Known staging was recorded for 67.7% of registered cancers (4,810 of 7,106). Reaching 75.0% requires about 650 additional early diagnoses across the ICB. Early detection was 88.2% for breast cancer but 33.2% for lung. Locally, PCN cervical screening coverage is 72.0% (England 66.8%), though three-year change was -2.5% (England -1.0%). Prioritising screening recall can support earlier diagnosis.

    Sources & context

    Stage at diagnosis: National Disease Registration Service

    Powered by Coplug · Page 7 of 15
    08 / 15

    Cancer waits, diagnostics and community services

    Cancer waits, diagnostics and community services

    Cancer waits and diagnostics, Jul 2026 (provisional)

    In July 2026, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust met the 28-day faster diagnosis standard at 77.7% (standard 75.0%) and the 31-day combined treatment standard at 96.2% (standard 96.0%). However, 62-day referral to treatment was 70.0% against the 85.0% standard, below Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust (84.5%), Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (86.8%), NHS Surrey and Sussex Integrated Care Board (71.5%), and England (71.2%).

    Pathways within standard (%)Surrey and Sussex HealthcareEpsom and St HelierRoyal SurreySurrey and Sussex ICBEngland
    28-day faster diagnosis (75%)77.7489.7082.6279.2979.32
    31-day treatment (96%)96.2099.1696.4390.4592.50
    62-day referral to treatment (85%)69.9786.8284.4871.5171.16
    Diagnostic waits over 6 weeks (%)Surrey and Sussex HealthcareEpsom and St HelierRoyal SurreyEngland
    MRI27.530.310.0021.40
    CT18.491.060.159.92
    Echocardiography43.7825.491.5528.48
    Colonoscopy15.1133.010.0030.83
    Gastroscopy21.0630.900.0029.02
    All 15 DM01 tests28.506.838.8223.14
    Community services activitySurrey residentsSurrey and Sussex ICB
    Care contacts109,530309,615
    Referrals28,70066,930
    Patients with a contact33,51085,660

    Community services (residents of Surrey), Jun 2026 (provisional). Provisional Community Services Dataset figures for June 2026 show that adults aged 65+ accounted for 69.6% of community contacts among Mole Valley residents (76,215 of 109,530). For Dorking PCN, where 24.9% of registered patients are aged 65+, this heavy older-age community caseload underscores the value of coordinating proactive chronic disease reviews and palliative pathways with local community teams.

    Sources & context

    Waits and diagnostics: NHS England monthly statistics · ICB and provider data, not PCN

    Powered by Coplug · Page 8 of 15
    09 / 15

    Practice variation and patient experience

    Patient satisfaction exceeds England but phone access varies by 27.3 percentage points

    In 2025/26, all four practices achieved 100.0% in QOF clinical points (England 97.1%). However, vaccination achievement varied by 45.8 pp, from 54.2% at Brockwood Medical Practice to 100.0% at Dorking Medical Practice (England 55.2%). High clinical scores may mask uptake disparities, meaning childhood immunisation call-recall processes require cross-practice review.

    GP Patient Survey by practice

    PracticeResponses% in IMD Q1Phone easyRequest led to apptOverall good
    Medwyn Surgery1180.080.0%75.3%95.1%
    Brockwood Medical1070.088.4%69.8%94.4%
    Leith Hill1220.087.0%77.0%92.3%
    Dorking Medical1220.061.1%70.9%85.5%
    England—~2156.9%71.6%76.7%
    Sources & context

    QOF achievement; GP Patient Survey, practice-level results

    Powered by Coplug · Page 9 of 15
    11 / 15

    What the data can't tell us: gaps and local assets

    What the data can't tell us: gaps and local assets

    Local assets and voluntary sectorPCNMole ValleyAssetPCNMole Valley
    Care homes (catchment)26 (977 beds)n/aSchools (catchment)52n/a
    Children's centres36Places of worship4765
    Libraries13Food banks (VCS)13
    Homelessness support (VCS)n/a1Day centres (VCS)52
    Children and young people (VCS)n/a1Carers support groups (VCS)22
    Primary schools (LA maintained)510Primary academies711

    0 = the source returned zero. n/a = not held at this level. No data = no value returned; this does not mean zero.

    Sources & context

    Gaps are modelled estimates against benchmark rates; local assets as supplied

    Powered by Coplug · Page 11 of 15
    12 / 15

    Options for the PCN

    Options for the PCN

    Each option in full

    Option 1

    SMI physical health check recall

    Across 434 SMI patients, BMI recording is 76.6% (England 82.1%, Mole Valley 82.2%, ICB 82.9%) after falling 1.9 pp over three years (England +5.1 pp), and BP checks are 80.8% (England 83.4%). Moderate effort to run.

    Evidence base: the SMI register is the cohort for the annual physical health check; the alcohol record is the delivery measure for alcohol screening and brief intervention.

    Policy anchor: Mental Health Investment Standard; NHS alcohol care teams and the From Harm to Hope strategy.

    Option 2

    Learning disability register validation

    Recorded learning disability QOF prevalence is 0.4% (174 patients) against 0.5% in Mole Valley and the ICB and 0.6% in England, giving an unadjusted benchmark gap of +50 to +90 patients. Low cost, quick to run.

    Evidence base: the register is the cohort for the annual health check and LeDeR learning; people with a learning disability die on average 20 years earlier and are a Core20PLUS5 PLUS group.

    Policy anchor: annual health checks for 75% of people aged 14+ on the register (Network Contract DES); Oliver McGowan mandatory training.

    Option 3

    Structured asthma and COPD review recall

    Asthma annual reviews reach 66.8% of 3,066 patients (leaving 1,017, or about 1,000, without a recorded review), while COPD reviews reach 74.7% across 781 patients (England 76.4%, ICB 77.7%). Low cost, quick to run.

    Evidence base: the annual asthma review is the process gap between the register and outcomes.

    Policy anchor: Core20PLUS5 chronic respiratory disease priority.

    Sources & context

    Options are the profile's; evidence base from Coplug's indicator catalogue

    Powered by Coplug · Page 12 of 15
    13 / 15

    Provenance and audit trail

    Provenance and audit trail

    Figures are the profile's, drawn from Coplug indicator tables: census, deprivation and QOF measures, MHCLG, Rough sleeping snapshot in England: autumn 2025, OHID, Fingertips diabetes by frailty status: HbA1c control (93712, 93713) and OHID, Fingertips falls: emergency admissions, 65+ and 65 to 79 (22401, 22402), accidental-fall deaths (94002). Every recommended action and option is the profile's own; the evidence-base statements that support them — what each register is the cohort for, and the national policy it serves — are quoted from Coplug's indicator catalogue. No recommendation in this report is authored outside the profile and that catalogue. ICB- and provider-level data (page 8) describes the system the PCN sits in and is not read as PCN performance.

    RecommendationIndicator(s)Policy anchorData level
    Proactive frailty and care planning (p2)Aged 65+Neighbourhood health framework · NHS vaccination strategyPCN
    SMI physical check audit (p4)SMI register with a BMI recorded in the last 12 monthsMHIS · From Harm to HopePCN
    Hypertension case finding review (p5)Hypertension: QOF prevalenceCore20PLUS5 CVD · CVDPREVENT 2029PCN
    Childhood immunisation recall (p6)MMR dose 2 coverage at age 510YHP sickness to prevention · 95% targetPCN
    Cervical screening recall audit (p7)Women (25-49 yrs) with a record of cervical screening in the last 3.5 yrs (denominator incl. PCAs)Fit for the Future: 10 Year Health Plan for England · Medium Term Planning Framework 2026PCN
    Telephone access pathway review (p9)GPPS good overall experience of the practice10YHP, hospital to communityPractice
    Option 1 · SMI physical health check recall (p12)Severe mental illness register · SMI register with a BMI recorded in the last 12 months · Record of BMI in the last 12 months for patients on the MH register (denominator incl. PCAs)MHIS · From Harm to HopePCN & Practice
    Option 2 · Learning disability register validation (p12)Learning disability register · Learning disability: QOF prevalence75% annual health checks (Network Contract DES) · Oliver McGowanPCN
    Option 3 · Structured asthma and COPD review recall (p12)Asthma register · Patients with Asthma: review in the last 12 months (denominator incl. PCAs) · COPD registerCore20PLUS5 respiratoryPCN
    Sources & context

    Re-run this profile in 12 months to see whether the gaps have narrowed

    Powered by Coplug · Page 13 of 15
    14 / 15

    Data sources

    Data sources

    Every figure in this profile comes from a dataset below, at the level and period stated. Nothing published above PCN level is read as PCN performance.

    DatasetLevelPeriodUsed for
    Coplug indicator tables: census, deprivation and QOF measuresPCN & Practice2023 to 2025, projected to 2030; 2023 to 2024Pages 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12
    MHCLG, Rough sleeping snapshot in England: autumn 2025Local authorityAutumn 2025Pages 2, 4
    OHID, Fingertips diabetes by frailty status: HbA1c control (93712, 93713)PCN2024/25Pages 2, 4
    OHID, Fingertips falls: emergency admissions, 65+ and 65 to 79 (22401, 22402), accidental-fall deaths (94002)Local authority2024/25; 2022-24Pages 2, 4
    ONS, Census 2021 TS039: provision of unpaid care (age-standardised)Local authorityCensus 2021Pages 2, 4
    QOF registers, prevalence and care processes (Coplug indicator tables)Practice2023 to 2025, projected to 2030Pages 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10
    UKHSA, COVER supplementary GP data, childhood immunisation coverage, Q1 2025/26PCN & PracticeQ1 2025/26Pages 4, 6
    UKHSA, Seasonal influenza vaccine uptake in GP patients, 2025 to 2026ICB2025/26 season to 28 Feb 2026Pages 4, 6
    NHS England, Cancer Waiting Times: July 2026 monthly time series with revisionsICB & ProviderJul 2026 (provisional)Pages 7, 8
    NHS England, Community Services Statistics (CSDS): June 2026 provisional experimental dataICB & Local authorityJun 2026 (provisional)Pages 7, 8
    NHS England, Monthly Diagnostics Waiting Times and Activity (DM01): provider by test, July 2026ProviderJul 2026Pages 7, 8
    National Disease Registration Service, Stage at diagnosis by cancer site in England, 2013 to 2022ICB2022Pages 7, 8
    NHS England / Ipsos, GP Patient Survey 2026: practice results (weighted)PracticeSurvey Jan-Apr 2026Page 9
    NHS England, Quality and Outcomes Framework 2025-26: achievement by practice and domainPractice2025/26Page 9
    NHS England, Quality and Outcomes Framework 2025-26: personalised care adjustments by practice and domainPractice2025/26Page 9
    Coplug indicator catalogue — definitions, cohorts, policy anchorsReferenceCurrentEvidence-base lines, page 13
    Sources & context

    Where a period is given as "as supplied", the source file did not state a vintage

    Powered by Coplug · Page 14 of 15
    15 / 15

    Methods, data-quality notes and limitations

    Methods, data-quality notes and limitations

    Methods

    Estimated gaps apply benchmark prevalence to the registered population and subtract the recorded register. They size the task; they are not confirmed missed patients.

    Percentage points are the difference between two rates; a relative change is that difference as a share of the starting rate. Register changes are relative, over three years.

    Forecasts to 2030 extend each indicator's current trajectory with no change in case-finding or service model: a baseline to act against, not a prediction.

    Core20 is the most deprived 20% nationally (IMD quintile 1). Practice shares are not additive to the PCN figure. Ethnic minority is 100% minus White. Local-authority averages are unweighted.

    Sources & context

    Estimates size the task; they are not confirmed missed patients

    Powered by Coplug · Page 15 of 15